Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to

Also in

Will Global Woes Knock Down US?

Tuesday, September 1, 2015
Money and Markets
You can also access this issue on our website.
Latest Figures Show Global Manufacturing, Exports Tanking
Market Roundup
Dow -469.68 to 16,058.35
S&P -58.32 to 1,913.85
NASDAQ -140.41 to 4,636.10
10-YR Yield -0.028 to 2.172%
Gold +$6.90 to $1,139.40
Oil -$3.99 to $45.21

By Mike Larson  

Stocks took another header today, with the Dow Industrials plunging 469 points, and the Nasdaq Composite shedding 2.8%. The VIX index of volatility jumped to almost 34, while "risk off" moves were the name of the game in currencies.

What's causing the renewed turmoil? A simple fact: Numbers don’t lie. And today, they showed that manufacturing and exports are tanking worldwide.

ArrowIn China, a key “official” index of manufacturing activity sank to 49.7 in August from 50 in July. That was the weakest in three years. A separate private report on production also remained stuck near its lowest in more than six years.

ArrowIn South Korea, exports plunged at a massive 14.7% rate in August. That was far worse than the mid-single-digit decline that was expected, and the biggest plunge since the 2009 Great Recession.

ArrowManufacturing activity in Chinese trading partners like Malaysia, Vietnam, and Japan is also falling. Indonesia showed its 11th straight contraction last month.

Manufacturing in China and elsewhere in Asia is struggling.

Arrow Many on Wall Street had been counting on the U.S. to hang in there, even as many foreign markets and economies deteriorate. But today’s Institute for Supply Management report dashed those hopes. The U.S. index sank to 51.1 in August from 52.7 in July. Not only did that miss economist forecasts, but it was also the worst reading since May 2013. That’s 27 long months ago.

Seeing a trend here? The numbers show the global economy is losing momentum, led by sharp slowdowns in emerging markets. Heck, even our neighbor to the north, Canada, just slipped into recession after its economy shrank for the second quarter in a row.

Now here’s where things get interesting to U.S. investors. I noted several days ago that the junk bond market was trading at levels that suggested the Dow Jones Industrial Average could trade down to around 13,000. A separate carry trade index I wrote about on Aug. 28 is trading at a level last seen when the Dow went for about 10,000.

The last time the Chinese manufacturing index was at these levels, the Dow went for the mid-12,000s. And the last time our ISM index was at these levels, the Dow was around 14,800.

Again, I’ll ask: Are you seeing a trend here? We’ve seen the U.S. stock market start to crack, with wild declines and equally powerful short-term bounces. But we’re still trading at far higher levels than several indicators suggest we “should” trade at.

“Raise cash, grab profits, sell losers and buy hedges.”

None of that guarantees stocks will plunge. Other influences can drive equities on any given day, week, or month. But the sum total of the indicators I watch suggest this is the time to “raise shields,” so to speak, and gird for a battle with an increasingly volatile market. That means raise cash, grab profits, sell losers, and buy hedges like inverse ETFs and put options on big rallies when they’re cheap.

Are you doing that yet? If not, why? What do you think about the Dow’s fair value – is it 14,800? 13,000? 10,000? Or have stocks already declined enough to reflect the threats I just highlighted? These are hugely important questions, so please go visit the Money and Markets website and let me know what you think.

Our Readers Speak

What will the Federal Reserve do next? What about the latest turmoil in China? And just how do I feel about stocks? That’s what everyone was talking about over at the website since yesterday.

Reader Frebon said the Fed needs to take action, rather than keep sitting on its hands. The comments: “The Fed raising rates is a good thing not a bad one. The Fed’s mandate has nothing to do with the market, only employment and inflation. They have failed on both with their current policies, as the published unemployment rate is a farce.

“They need to re-load their bullets if they will ever be able to help in the event of another recession. A Fed rate of 0.75% by year’s end should be their target, and 1.5% by June. Then they should re-assess the situation.”

Reader J.P.F. also said cheap money is causing more problems, rather than helping: “Haven’t we had enough of easy money, zero-interest rate policy? What’s the point of having a so-called ‘free market’ if marginal bets are not free to fail, as well as succeed in the market? As a saver, and longer-term investor, this past 10 years has certainly been a nightmare!”

But Reader Billy said raising rates is only going to make a bad situation even worse: “You almost get the feeling they are trying to help this deflationary storm grow stronger by the day (hidden agenda?). Look, the bottom line is we now have a perfect storm forming of growing deflation, massive toxic debt, crashing commodities, particularly oil/gas, a crashing Chinese economy and stock market, major technical and cyclical warning signs, and major geo-political problems ALL occurring simultaneously!”

As far as the impact of a hike or no hike, Reader Chuck B. offered this take: “Mike, you seem about as uncertain about the market direction as I am. The Fed seems to be inclined to push rates up a touch, anyway, while hoping that won’t cause a panic.

“I’m watching Larry’s charts, though, and if they seem to be turning out right, I’m holding back a few bucks to feed in when his big correction seems to be ending. And it is a correction – and overdue, at that, which may make it pretty scary. Perhaps we need a scare.”

Thanks for sharing, everyone. My view on the Fed is that policymakers clearly want to hike. They clearly should have already started hiking months ago, an opinion I laid out back then, and many others share.

But they have also shown that they’re slaves to the market. They’re scared of their own shadow, and basing policies that take several months to impact the economy off of a couple days’ trading in stocks and bonds. It’s no way to run an economy, but it’s how the Fed is doing things these days.

As for being uncertain about markets, I (respectfully) disagree. I have been ramping up my market warnings all summer here in Money and Markets. Literally DAYS before the Dow plunged almost 1,100 points at the open, I warned that “The bond market is screaming that stocks are toast.” A few weeks ago, I said central planners had lost control and that the “autopilot” market was over. And on Aug. 7, I said in no uncertain terms that I was “getting more cautions now than at any time in years.” That was more than 1,300 points ago on the Dow.

I went even further in my Safe Money Report, bagging multiple profits, cut a few losers, raised cash and hedged against declines. And I made the lion’s share of those moves before the big break in stocks.

And by all means, don’t miss the signals the various markets are sending out. Conditions are getting more volatile, and more treacherous to your wealth here. That’s why I believe protective action is warranted, and why I’m increasingly concerned the entire six-and-a-half-year bull market may be over.

Other Developments of the Day

BulletWho doesn’t like a parade? Apparently, the Chinese do, because they’re about to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the conclusion of World War II with a massive display of military might.

The interesting thing now is that China is launching this celebration of its own magnificence at the same time its stock market, currency, and economy are slumping badly. So it’s doing all it can to artificially prop things up until the last tank rolls down the street – including new steps that make it more expensive for banks to bet against the Chinese yuan. But the country can’t fight the fundamentals forever.

BulletAre central bankers out of bullets? That’s an argument I’ve been making for several quarters now, and the mainstream media is jumping on the bandwagon. Here’s just one example from the Financial Times, where the writer concludes:

“Several signs suggest loose monetary policy is increasingly proving ineffective, and central banks are failing to generate enough cyclical upswing to win against the structural forces constraining growth and inflation. Monetary stimulus alone cannot fix debt overhangs, low productivity, persistent unemployment, stagnant demographics and a lack of reforms and fiscal stimulus.”

Sounds about right to me – and that’s why I’ve been arguing that you need to take your financial future into your own hands, rather than count on Washington (or Frankfurt, or Tokyo, or …) to bail markets out anymore.

So what do you think? How concerned should we be about the major slowdown in China and elsewhere in Asia? Or about the fact central bankers are running out of bullets? Let me hear about it at the website.

Until next time,

Mike Larson

Mike Larson
Mike Larson graduated from Boston University with a B.S. degree in Journalism and a B.A. degree in English in 1998, and went to work for There, he learned the mortgage and interest rates markets inside and out. Mike then joined Weiss Research in 2001. He is the editor of Safe Money Report. He is often quoted by the Washington Post, Reuters, Dow Jones Newswires, Orlando Sentinel, Palm Beach Post and Sun-Sentinel, and he has appeared on CNN, Bloomberg Television and CNBC.
The investment strategy and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of any other editor at Weiss Research or the company as a whole.

For more information and archived issues, visit

Facebook Twitter Linkedin YouTube Pinterest

Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter published by Weiss Research, Inc. This publication does not provide individual, customized investment or trading advice. All information is based upon data whose accuracy is deemed reliable, but not guaranteed. Performance returns cited are derived from our best estimates, but hypothetical as we do not track actual prices of customer purchases and sales. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of third party advertisements or sponsors, and these ads do not necessarily express the viewpoints of Money and Markets or its editors. For more information, see our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

To make sure you don't miss our urgent updates, just follow these simple steps to add our email to your address book. Would you like to unsubscribe from our mailing list?

Attention editors and publishers! Money and Markets teaser content may be republished with a link to the full story on Such republication must include attribution with a link to the MoneyandMarkets home page as follows: "Source:"

Money and Markets
A Division of Weiss Research, Inc.

4400 Northcorp Parkway, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 | 1-800-291-8545


All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.

Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.