Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to

Also in

Forget QE -- It's QT Now

Wednesday, September 2, 2015
Money and Markets
You can also access this issue on our website.
Forget the Fed's QE. "QT" Means Money is ALREADY Getting Tighter
Market Roundup
Dow +293.03 to 16,351.38
S&P +35.01 to 1,948.86
NASDAQ +113.87 to 4,749.98
10-YR Yield +0.021 to 2.193%
Gold -$6.60 to $1,133.30
Oil +$0.67 to $46.08

By Mike Larson

Wild volatility ... again. That was the story of today's markets, considering stocks rallied sharply at the open, faded dramatically, then ripped higher into the close. The Dow finished 293 points higher, while the Nasdaq gained almost 2.5%. But neither the Industrials nor the S&P 500 recouped yesterday's losses.

So where do we go next? The Federal Reserve meets precisely two weeks from now. The debate over what policymakers will do is reaching a fever pitch, with the battle lines clearly drawn on Wall Street.

But guess what? Money is ALREADY getting tighter around the world, Fed or no Fed.

You now, can see it in the rising junk bond spreads I told you about a couple weeks ago. You can see it in the collapse of the carry trade index I highlighted a few days ago. And according to fresh research from Deutsche Bank, things are only getting worse – with “Quantitative Tightening” (QT) rapidly replacing “Quantitative Easing” (QE).

What’s QT? The systematic bleeding out of the huge liquidity reserves that foreign central banks built up in the last decade and a half.

Those reserves already shrank by around $55 billion between mid-2014 and the first quarter of this year.

For example, “petrodollar” countries like Saudi Arabia have been forced to spend billions of dollars per week in additional funds just to fill gaps in their budgets.

“Petrodollar” countries like Saudi Arabia have been forced to spend billions of dollars in additional funds to fill budget gaps.

Meanwhile, China is reportedly blowing through reserves at an annualized pace of as much as $500 billion now. That’s because global and domestic investors are yanking capital out of the country amid fears of currency devaluation, falling markets, and a slumping economy.

Deutsche Bank’s conclusion? “This force is likely to be a persistent headwind … and the path to ‘normalization’ will likely remain slow and fraught with difficulty.”

My take: More QT means less “funny money” floating around to inflate global asset prices.

We’re going to see upward pressure on Treasury bond yields.

We’re going to see downward pressure on risky bonds.

We’re going to see more stock market liquidation.

And we’re going to see more panicky moves in the currency and volatility markets.

“We’re going to see more panicky moves in the currency and volatility markets.”

That doesn’t preclude short-term rallies. It doesn’t mean markets will crash further overnight. But it offers even more confirmation of the forecast I shared with you a while ago:

You need to get more cautious with your investments … and pay much closer attention to evolving trends, too.

So what do you think? Is QT more powerful than QE? How will policymakers respond to the draining away of easy money? What about investors like you? How will you respond and adapt now that the autopilot market is over? Let me hear about it at the Money and Markets website.

Our Readers Speak

After another plunge of several hundred points in the Dow Industrials, many of you shared your opinion of what’s going on, and what you expect to see next.

Reader Ted F. said the chaos now is an inevitable consequence of what pushed stocks so high in the first place: Too much easy money. His view:

“How much of the market’s past highs for the last few years were floating on the Fed’s funny money, AKA QE? How much overseas was likewise floating on hot air? The Chinese were spending huge amounts on construction of unneeded cities.

“FDR during the 1930s spent massive (at the time) amounts on construction but it was dams, airports, and roads, plus public buildings. Now much of that construction is falling apart and the governments concerned are too far in debt to fund reconstruction of that. How much of the QE funny money should have been spent there, instead of bailing out the banks and corporate America?”

Reader Chuck B. offered this view on how far stocks could fall: “In 2008-09, the Dow retrenched about 50%. If that happened again, it would put the Dow in the 9000s. Play that for what it’s worth. Maybe – maybe not. But it does argue a good bit more of a drop is possible.”

A decline of that magnitude would seem tailor-made for hedge vehicles like inverse ETFs, but Reader Erick T. asked whether they’re appropriate: “There are those who are pointing out that the Inverse ETFs you recommend as a hedge are also susceptible to volatile markets as much as the regular ETFs. Have you any opinion concerning these particular investment instruments related to risk?”

Thanks for your opinions on market direction and inverse ETFs. It’s obvious that in the past few years, all the easy money pumped into the system here and overseas inflated asset prices beyond fundamental value. They also inflated shares far beyond what other indicators of value – like junk bonds, carry trade indices, economic data, etc. – suggested they should trade at.

The widening gulf between fantasy and reality was a major reason I got much more cautious earlier this summer, BEFORE market volatility exploded and stocks tanked. And it’s why I started legging my subscribers back into inverse ETFs, also before stocks suffered the worst of their declines.

As for whether they work, it depends on which inverse ETFs you’re talking about and which underlying sectors they target. The more leverage, and the more volatile the underlying sector, the worse the long-term tracking error gets – and vice versa.

So if you have a 3X leveraged, inverse ETF on a volatile sector like technology, you’re best off trading it actively and only holding for shorter-term time frames. If you’re using an unleveraged, inverse ETF on something like the Dow Industrials, you can buy and hold for much longer periods of time to profit in a down market because the tracking error is much smaller.

(Editor’s note: Mike’s latest Safe Money Report issues and Flash Alerts go into much more detail on this, and contain actionable “Buy” and “Sell” recommendations of inverse ETFs.)

Reader Ken F. sounded ready to throw up his hands on the website, saying: “The small retail investor has no chance in this market. Hedge funds, computer trading, and insider front running has made it impossible to buy and sell stocks based on value.”

My take: I know it’s easy to get frustrated in a market like this. But you most definitely DO have a chance … if you’re getting much better guidance than the usual useless platitudes spewed by Wall Street.

Anything else I didn’t cover here? Anything I said that you strongly agree or disagree with? Then let me hear about it at the website.

Other Developments of the Day

BulletWe got the early look at August job creation from the ADP Research Institute today. The private firm said U.S. companies added 190,000 jobs last month, slightly less than the 200,000 that was forecast. July’s reading was also revised lower by 8,000. But the figures certainly weren’t enough of a disaster to push the Federal Reserve off its policy tightening path.

BulletThe European Central Bank meets tomorrow, and many investors are counting on some kind of increase in Euro-QE, according to the Wall Street Journal. But European bonds are pricing in less and less expected inflation each day, and Europe’s economy is just muddling along.

That means the ECB’s 1-trillion-euro QE program isn’t working anymore just a few short months after it was launched in March. So it’s reasonable to ask what some new move would accomplish, and whether markets will even care if one is announced.

BulletRegardless of whether you agree with it, the Iranian nuclear deal that President Obama pushed through looks like it will survive any Congressional challenges. That’s because Obama appears to have lined up enough support in the Senate to override any veto of the agreement.

BulletWorld peace may be hard to achieve. But fast food chain Burger King is trying. The company said it would work with other chains to roll out a “Peace Day Burger” on the International Day of Peace on Sept. 21. McDonald’s (MCD) rebuffed BK’s advance, however, showing that the burger wars are still far from over.

So what do you think the ECB will do, and will markets even react given the failure of past Euro-QE to accomplish anything there? What are your thoughts about the American jobs picture? Or the apparent bullet-proof nature of the Iranian accord? Hit up the website and let me hear your opinions on these or other topics.

Until next time,

Mike Larson

Mike Larson
Mike Larson graduated from Boston University with a B.S. degree in Journalism and a B.A. degree in English in 1998, and went to work for There, he learned the mortgage and interest rates markets inside and out. Mike then joined Weiss Research in 2001. He is the editor of Safe Money Report. He is often quoted by the Washington Post, Reuters, Dow Jones Newswires, Orlando Sentinel, Palm Beach Post and Sun-Sentinel, and he has appeared on CNN, Bloomberg Television and CNBC.
The investment strategy and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of any other editor at Weiss Research or the company as a whole.

For more information and archived issues, visit

Facebook Twitter Linkedin YouTube Pinterest

Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter published by Weiss Research, Inc. This publication does not provide individual, customized investment or trading advice. All information is based upon data whose accuracy is deemed reliable, but not guaranteed. Performance returns cited are derived from our best estimates, but hypothetical as we do not track actual prices of customer purchases and sales. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of third party advertisements or sponsors, and these ads do not necessarily express the viewpoints of Money and Markets or its editors. For more information, see our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

To make sure you don't miss our urgent updates, just follow these simple steps to add our email to your address book. Would you like to unsubscribe from our mailing list?

Attention editors and publishers! Money and Markets teaser content may be republished with a link to the full story on Such republication must include attribution with a link to the MoneyandMarkets home page as follows: "Source:"

Money and Markets
A Division of Weiss Research, Inc.

4400 Northcorp Parkway, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 | 1-800-291-8545


All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.

Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.