Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk

Also in huffingtonpost.com

The Waugh Zone February 23, 2016

Politics
Tuesday 23 February 2016
The Waugh Zone February 23, 2016



The five things you need to know on Tuesday February 23, 2016…


boris johnson



1) BLUE-ON-BLUE MONDAY

Ever since Boris’s Sunday afternoon doorstep, the storm clouds have been looming. For all his protestations of loyalty, the Mayor’s verdict on Cameron’s Brussels deal sounded very much like a declaration of hostilities (‘I have to tell you now that no such undertaking on national sovereignty has been received, and that consequently this Boris is at war with Dave,’ he all but said).

Well, the phoney war was well and truly over by the time the PM got up yesterday in the Commons. His ridiculing of Boris was a real Parliamentary moment, as was Boris’s self-hugging stance and mouthing of ‘rubbish’. From the jibe about ambition to marriage vows to the ‘second referendum’, this was Cameron at the height of his powers and Labour MPs loved every minute (maybe because the PM did something they’ve never managed: to lay a glove on Johnsons).

Farage has mocked Cameron as Oliver Twist begging for ‘more’ from Brussels. But Cameron yesterday mocked Boris as Mr Micawber, hoping ‘something will turn up’ if we vote ‘Leave’ and naively think the EU will give us a better deal to keep us in. Cameron’s most wounding line was this: “Some people who want to leave…apparently want to use a Leave vote to Remain”.

As it happens, friends of Boris told me that he didn’t even register the marriage vows or ‘agenda’ ambition jibes. (‘Whatever!’ he replied, when told later of the meaning of the slights). But more importantly, on the second referendum, Boris wanted to make clear last night he had some time ago dumped the idea and that his Telegraph column had been misinterpreted. He wants a ‘positive exit’ and a new free trade and cooperation deal after a Leave vote. He does not want talks about staying in the EU under new terms. That will be seen by No.10 as a victory.

Shares in Boris have been on the slide since their high point at 5pm on Sunday, when he first backed Brexit. By 10pm his Vicky Pollard hedging in the Telegraph did him damage and by 4pm yesterday the PM’s onslaught left those Inner allies of the Mayor shaking their heads with a look of ‘I told you so..’.

Still, the PM was warned by Steve Baker at the 1922 Committee last night to rein in his attacks, telling him to ‘be kind to Boris’. Some in Labour think that by holding the referendum in June Dave has screwed Zac Goldsmith’s chances too, forcing him as it has to come out for Brexit (when a million London voters are EU nationals). Goldsmith’s £1.3m income on his tax return yesterday also gifted Sadiq Khan the ‘amateur Trustafarian’ attack line he needs.

And with so many backbenchers expressing disquiet yesterday, it’s not just the Bojo-Dave phoney war that’s now over. So too is the phoney truce among Eurosceptics about whether Cameron should quit after a Leave vote. Owen Paterson led the way on Sunday and Liam Fox yesterday said “never say never” about a leadership tilt. One leading Euroscep told me months ago ‘Dave’s feet won’t touch the ground if we get a Brexit vote’.

The Sun’s Harry Cole has an excellent line today too on the existential threat to Cameron’s premiership. One member of the 1922 Committe exec told him: “Cameron has now proven himself to be a poor negotiator. If we vote to come out of Europe then we will need to send someone else to cut the deal, and that’s before he’s even negotiated with his own MPs….I’m going to the wardrobe for my grey suit already.”


2) STERLING WORK

We often have this phrase in Westminster that there are few ‘market-moving’ stories or politicians left. But the way sterling tanked on the money markets yesterday was proof that Boris has that power, as City types took fright at the implications of a serious risk of Brexit. Moody’s assessment of the negative rating following any exit from the EU added to No.10’s case that this would all be a ‘leap into the dark’. (If the PM got a euro for every time he says that phrase, as well as ‘best of both worlds’, we could pay off our national debt pretty quickly).

But Eurosceptics may counter: in this Big Short age of wariness about money men, how many really trust ratings agencies like Moody’s anyway? And there’s a similar credibility problem for the latest letter to the Times from a third of FTSE100 bosses urging an In vote. Yes, it looks impressive to have so many big firms coming off the fence to warn of the stranger danger of life outside. Yet to paraphrase Michael Gove’s Brexit essay, this is analogue politics in a digital age. The well-worn device of ‘a letter to a newspaper’ looked a bit tired to many Tory MPs, and the Telegraph, Sun and Mail all point to the supermarkets and others who refused to sign it. As for that sterling plunge, I’m not sure it helped Cameron’s case when former Swedish PM Carl Bildt lectured British voters with a dismissive tweet: “If Boris Johnson didn't achieve anything else he at least succeeded in taking down the pound. Shows the #Brexit dangers.”

Still the Brexiteers need to have a better answer on what Brexit will look like. Nigel Farage told Anna Soubry in the BBC debate last night he didn’t want to be part of the single market, nor have even the status of Norway or Iceland. The PM is out on the road today to sell his EU vision to the punters.

Mark Carney appears before the Treasury Select at 10am. Maybe he should come clean on Brexit too though? When asked yesterday what contingency plans there were for an exit, No.10 trotted out the line that the PM was ‘focused on’ putting the In case. Yet aren’t the voters entitled to see all those Treasury contingency plans that undoubtedly exist?



3) LABOURED JOKE

Like Boris Johnson, Jeremy Corbyn found out yesterday that mockery is much more wounding than mano-a-mano political combat. Tory MP Chris Pincher’s heckle of ‘Who are you?’ prompted a guffawing that lasted a full 35 seconds. For once, Corbyn’s georgraphy teacher hard stared failed to work, partly because his own side thought it funny too, as evidenced by Andy Burnham’s grin.

Today Yvette Cooper tries to get serious with a new think tank with a swipe at Corbyn for offering ‘yesterday’s solutions’ on policy. Angela Eagle has also set up a new business panel with a former Nike exec Anthony Watson chairing it, the FT reports.

Chuka Umunna is ploughing his furrow outside the Shad Cab with a backbench debate today on gang violence. And at 2.15pm he will join others on the Home Affairs Committee quizzing Met chief Hogan Howe on the topic.

But it’s defence that is again the fault line for Labour today as the Shadow Cabinet meets. Emily Thornberry yesterday refused in her RUSI speech to commit to 2% defence spending, and also suggested money spent on four new Trident subs could be better spent on conventional forces.

The party’s commission on international policy meets today and will see Thornberry, Ken Livingstone, Hilary Benn and John Woodcock lock horns. And later Woodcock’s backbench defence committee will hear from both George Robertson and Des Browne offering rival views on Trident. Corbyn couldn’t make last night’s PLP but he will attend next Monday - just in time for Damian McBride’s first day working for Thornberry. Popcorn.



BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR…

Watch Tory MP Andrea Jenkyns (an opera fan who beat Ed Balls) belt out Mamma Mia on Radio 5’s Pienaar’s Politics.




4) CALL THE MIDWIFE

Anybody else remember Liam Fox’s Patients’ Passport, way back in 2003? The then Shadow Health Secretary had the idea (I’m such a saddo I still have one of the fake blue ‘passports’) to give patients right to spend their own NHS budget. Labour ridiculed the plan but today it took a step closer to reality.

Yes a long awaited review of maternity services has concluded that the NHS in England should offer pregnant women their own "personal budgets", worth at least £3,000, for anything from one-to-one midwifery care to home births, the use of birthing pools and hypnotherapy.

Labour may argue the real danger here is not patient choice but a lack of NHS midwives and further ‘privatisation’: the cash can be spent on ‘independent’ midwives or social enterprises. Still, Baroness Cumberlege is a highly regarded chair of the review and it could lead to better care.



5) THE VACCINES

At 2.30pm, the petitions committee meets and its main item will be the massively popular call for a debate on the NHS’s decision to limit the meningitis B vaccine to babies under nine months. Forget the daft ban Trump petition (and by the way, check out my US colleagues’ piece on how Donald Trump could actually now win the Presidency), this online activism broke all records.

The petition, which calls for all children under the age of 11 to be given the vaccine, and which has been signed by more than 700,000 people. It wasn’t just rugby star Matt Dawson who gave this campaign huge traction. Yesterday Clare and Mark Timmins released a picture of the final days of their seven-year-old son Mason, who died of the disease in 2013.

Ben Howlett, the Tory MP member of the committee, told the Telegraph he would have “absolutely no hesitation” in asking for the subject to be debated and also backed calls for the vaccination campaign to be extended.





If you’re reading this on the web, sign-up HERE to get the WaughZone delivered to your inbox.



Got something you want to share? Please send any stories/tips/quotes/pix/plugs/gossip to Paul Waugh (paul.waugh@huffingtonpost.com), Ned Simons (ned.simons@huffingtonpost.com), Graeme Demianyk (graeme.demianyk@huffingtonpost.com) and Owen Bennett (owen.bennett@huffingtonpost.com)

Follow HuffPost on Facebook and Twitter:


Get Huffington Post on the Go
Know something we don't? E-mail us at dailybrief@huffingtonpost.com
  |  Forward  |  MANAGE MY ALERTS
Huffington Post, 770 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

---------------------------

All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.


Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at questions@spamdex.co.uk. Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See https://archive.org. Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of http://spam.abuse.net Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.