Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to

Also in

The Waugh Zone March 31, 2016

Thursday 31 March 2016
The Waugh Zone March 31, 2016

The five things you need to know on Thursday March 31, 2016…

sajid javid

Paul is on holiday. So this morning's WaughZone is written by Owen Bennett.


‘Chaotic’, ‘disarray’, ‘crisis’ – some of the words on the front pages of the papers this morning as the Government’s handling of the steel industry is called into question.

David Cameron will this morning chair a meeting of key ministers in Downing Street to decide what action to take to try to save an industry which an estimated 40,000 jobs rely on.

Business Secretary Sajid Javid is flying back to the UK from Australia, but before he got on the plane he managed to add confusion to the claims of incompetence by pulling nationalisation off the table – despite his junior minister Anna Soubry just hours before saying all the options were being looked at.

Questions are also being asked about why the Government is still blocking an EU plan to impose greater tariffs on Chinese steel. Last month Javid claimed such a measure would be damaging for the UK economy as a whole as it could drive up the cost of projects for steel consumers.

The Guardian report on a Tata source saying the value of its British division is worth “almost zero”, and that it needs £4billion to get the businesses back on track. The paper also reports Government officials believe renationalisation would cost £1.5billion a year.

Of course any kind of state aid would have to comply with EU regulations, which are designed to stop governments giving an advantage to industries in the Single Market. Brussels is already investigating the €2billion aid package the Italians gave to its country’s steel maker, Ilva.

And here lies the problem for Cameron. If he says: ‘Well of course I would love to bail out the steel industry but the EU won’t let me’, the Brexiters would plaster that on every piece of campaigning literature from now to June 23.

Alternatively, if he says: ‘The industry clearly isn’t viable and we shouldn’t waste Government cash on it’, Labour has its attack lines sorted for the upcoming local elections.


While the Tories are struggling to get their ministers in the same country, let alone the same room, Labour are proving to be much more effective with their response to the crisis.

Jeremy Corbyn cut short his holiday to Devon (where he had lemon drizzle cake for breakfast one morning apparently) to travel to Port Talbot to meet steel workers.

After David Cameron turned down his suggestion for Parliament to be recalled, the Labour leader launched a petition on Parliament’s website (although Parliament would need to be recalled to consider the petition about whether Parliament should be recalled…)

Shadow Business Secretary Angela Eagle is making sure that while her Government equivalent is stuck in the air she is getting as much media time as possible, and the Mirror splashes with her line that ‘George Osborne is more interested in kowtowing to China’ than protecting UK steel.

Stephen Kinnock, who was over in Mumbai to put pressure on the Tata board ahead of their meeting, repeats the attack in a blog for Labour List.

It is not just Labour calling on the Government to bankroll the steel industry – Tory MP Tom Pursglove yesterday wrote a letter to Cameron asking for a “short-period of public-ownership” while a buyer is found.

Pursglove (who told me in an interview last year he is a “child of Thatcher”) has a majority in Corby of 2,412.


At a press gallery lunch last year, Sajid Javid made a joke about standing to be the next leader of the Tories. That sentence is probably the last time you’ll read the words ‘Sajid Javid’ and ‘next leader of the Tories’ together.

A survey on who should be the next Tory leader carried out for the Independent puts the Business Secretary on just five per cent with the public – and two per cent with Tory members.

Way out in front is Boris Johnson, with the support of 38% of the public and crucially – seeing as they are the selectorate after all – 42% with the party faithful.

So far, so predictable – but what is interesting is the rise of Theresa May, who finds herself in second place, ahead of old Omnishambles Osborne.

When May backed Remain in January, many felt she had dealt herself out of the leadership race to succeed Dave. But with Osborne crashing and burning, she could still emerge as the main rival to Boris and find herself in the final two to face party members.

If she does, she might just stand a better chance at beating Boris than Osborne. May is known for working the constituency associations up and down the country, and as a result is a popular figure among activists.

Should Boris fail to deliver Brexit – and it could well be painted out as HIS failure – the pragmatic, unflashy Theresa May might be a lot more appealing to those who vote in the leadership election.


The Mail is one of the few papers not to splash on steel this morning, instead leading with a report which reveals some uncomfortable truths about end-of-life care in hospitals.

According to the Royal College of Physicians, half of patients had not been helped to drink in their final 24 hours, two thirds had not been helped to eat and one in six had Do Not Resuscitate orders issued without discussion with either them or their families.

One nurse said her colleagues mustn’t adopt a cross-the-road mentality when it comes to dealing with those close to death.

The Mirror’s take on the report focuses on the lack of 24-hour palliative care in nine out ten hospitals surveyed.

BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR:This little boy decides violence is not the answer when confronted with a pinata. Prepare to go 'awwwwww'.


It’s a little known fact (that I always mention on Twitter) that I once followed Nigel Farage around for a bit and wrote about him. How I wish I was American and Donald Trump was my muse.

Everyday, he manages to bring a new slice of fear and loathing to his campaign trail.

His latest outburst involved him saying that women should suffer “some sort of punishment” for having an abortion if the procedure was banned in the States.

Republicans and Democrats criticised the remarks, which prompted a rare u-turn from Trumpety-Trump.

In a statement he said those who carried out the procedure should be punished, and added: “The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb.”

This is not the first time a Republican has stumbled on the issue of gender rights. In 2012, Republican Senate nominee Todd Akin said that in instances of “legitimate rape” the body manages to block unwanted pregnancies.

The book really would write itself.

Follow HuffPost on Facebook and Twitter:

Get Huffington Post on the Go
Know something we don't? E-mail us at
  |  Forward  |  MANAGE MY ALERTS
Huffington Post, 770 Broadway, New York, NY 10003


All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.

Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.