Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk

Also in huffingtonpost.com

The Waugh Zone June 24 2015

The Waugh Zone June 24 2015




The five things you need to know on Wednesday June 24, 2015...


iain duncan smith cameron




1) POVERTY OF EXPECTATION

As I pointed out in yesterday’s WaughZone (and reported on the day), the most interesting line in David Cameron’s welfare speech on Monday was his very clear signal that he wanted to reform the child poverty target. Today, several papers have picked up on the significance of what he said, with the Guardian and Times putting it on their front pages.

The Cabinet meeting yesterday certainly gave the story legs as Nicky Morgan, IDS and Oliver Letwin (a quietly important figure in many of the PM’s deliberations) led a discussion on the ‘right’ definition of poverty. The PM does agree with IDS that it is ‘absurd’ that a rise in pensions can shift more children over the poverty line, defined as 60% of median income.

One option is to widen the definition to run alongside a new version of a relative poverty measurement, adding in a mix of key indicators of real deprivation such as family breakdown, worklessness, poor education, debt, addiction. With the latest figures due out tomorrow, ministers are braced for the worst, but IDS appears to be winning his long battle with the Treasury that a wider definition is needed.

The Times says that the Child Poverty Act - which many agree now looks out of date because it commits governments to eradicating child poverty by 2020 - will be repealed, partly because ministers fear a legal challenge could curb the next round of welfare cuts. Expect Harriet Harman to pounce on that one today in PMQs. Privately Blair always felt that the Act would only serve as an incentive to get the numbers down and few believed the target would be hit. But perhaps it’s a lesson in how legal straitjackets and ‘binding’ targets aren’t always a good idea.


2) UPSETTING THE A LA CARTE

Calais may have been recaptured by the French in 1558 but it has long been seen on both sides of the Channel as an ‘English problem’. Henry VIII would probably have preferred to run through a few migrants but that option isn’t open to our border force staff as they struggle to contend with the aftermath of yesterday’s wildcat strike. James Brokenshire has been manning the political defences on the Today prog. Expect the PM to say more in PMQs today. Labour (under David Hanson) has been pushing this issue for some time, while UKIP too will seek to exploit it.

The trickier European problem for David Cameron is his EU renegotiation and he’ll be happier to be visiting Germany rather than France this afternoon. French economy minister Emmanuel Macron has told the BBC that the UK could not be allowed a "Europe a la carte". "I don't understand how it is possible to say 'we the UK have all the positive aspects of Europe but don't want to share any of the risk with any member states' It just doesn't fly. It's a common responsibility."

The FT points out that while the PM will be arriving in the slipstream of the Queen (and her proud German roots), he has sometimes overestimated the ability or willingness of Angela Merkel to deliver what he wants in Brussels. Officials in No10 refer to Germany as ‘the G1’ in Europe, but Gisela Stuart tells the paper: “Cameron doesn’t understand that for Merkel the EU is existential — it is a fact of history and geography — it is not optional”.



3) LANCING THE ROYALS

Is the SNP exacting revenge on the Queen for her infamous line during the Scots indyref that ‘I hope people will think very carefully about the future’? Well, there’s a mixed picture today. Several papers splash on the line from Palace officials that Scotland intends to retain profits from the Crown Estate, a move that could cut funding to the Monarchy by £2m.

Courtiers (dontcha love that word) used a briefing on the Royal finances yesterday to play a bit of poker, suggesting that Nicola Sturgeon seemed more hardline on the issue than Alex Salmond. A Scottish government spokesman appeared to insist that the shortfall would be made up from general taxation. “Scotland will continue to make the same financial contribution to the monarchy as at present – there will be no reduction in the sovereign grant as a result of devolution of the crown estate.”

All of which could have been a neat ruse for the Palace to distract from the fact that the Royals had received a 6.7% increase in funding despite wider austerity for the public. And in a nod to Parliament’s own woes over renovation, officials said the Queen could move out of Buck House temporarily while £150m is spent on a refurb. It’s a battle between two of the cannier PR outfits in public life. Sturgeon, a dab hand on the media, could respond today.



BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR...

Watch this video of Japanese bullet train staff prep every carriage in just seven minutes flat. Their average age is 52.



4) LEADING LABOUR

The Independent has an ORB survey claiming that Andy Burnham is seen by the public as the candidate most likely to improve Labour’s chances at the next election. Burnham is on 36%, to Liz Kendall’s 25%, Yvette Cooper’s 20% and Jeremy Corbyn (not that far behind) on 18%. Burnham’s camp will hope this helps dispel his reputation as a ‘left wing’ candidate, and tonight he has a speech on reviving home ownership.

There are bits of the poll (and of course all polls are these days seen with very jaudiced eyes) that the contenders can cherry pick. Kendall is the favourite of under-24s, Cooper is the women’s choice. Corbyn is seen as the candidate who would do most harm to Labour’s chances in 2020 (by 36%). As for those ‘Tories for Corbyn’, Michael Gove became the latest recruit to the cause yesterday, though Labour has decided to pocket their cash while denying them a vote.



5) GOVE LOVE

Michael Gove’s speech yesterday had the legal profession cooing with praise for its reforming vision and conciliatory tone. But there was a hint of mischief and steel in his warning that richer solicitors should do more legal aid work for free, never mind his review of FoI laws.

Yet what was also clear was his strong hint in the Commons that he would axe the Grayling-Clegg plan for a Secure College aka a ‘mega-Borstal’ in Leicestershire. The 320-bed fortified school for teenage offenders had been slammed by many charities who worried it would bring back the days of ‘Scum’ and Ray Winston’s billiard-ball-in-a-sock violence.

But Justice Secretary took the wind out of Labour’s sails by making plain it wouldn’t go ahead. The Treasury will be pleased at the £100m saving, but expect Gove to come back to the issue of educating prisoners - of all ages.

After Gove’s edict on civil servants’ grammar, a few papers relish Gove’s revelation on Wato that Stephen Fry had texted him “correcting me on some of my own errors linguistically."




ONES TO WATCH

The Guardian has an interview with Welsh Secretary Stephen Crabb ahead of his big speech on new devolution powers.

Boris’s final State of London speech last night had some good lines, not least his plan for a ‘Knowledge-lite’ for Uber drivers. He also suggested the PM would definitely rule out a third runway at Heathrow. There was lots of banter but the Mayor came unstuck when he asked an audience member 'Why aren't you standing?' The man replied: 'Because I'm in a wheelchair'. How very Joe Biden.





If you’re reading this on the web, sign-up HERE to get the WaughZone delivered to your inbox.



Got something you want to share? Please send any stories/tips/quotes/pix/plugs/gossip to Paul Waugh (paul.waugh@huffingtonpost.com), Ned Simons (ned.simons@huffingtonpost.com), Graeme Demianyk (graeme.demianyk@huffingtonpost.com) and Owen Bennett (owen.bennett@huffingtonpost.com)

Follow HuffPost UK Politics on Facebook and Twitter

770 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

---------------------------

All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.


Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at questions@spamdex.co.uk. Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See https://archive.org. Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of http://spam.abuse.net Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.