Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to

Also in

The Waugh Zone March 22, 2017

Wednesday 22 March 2017
The Waugh Zone March 22, 2017

The five things you need to know on Wednesday, March 22…

nicola sturgeon


Another PMQs looms. And as Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn square up over the despatch box, the former Home Secretary may well talk of the new aircraft laptop ban. A fresh terror threat forms a particularly poignant backdrop to the tributes to Martin McGuinness that are sure to feature too today. Will any Tory backbencher dare to raise Corbyn's support for Sinn Fein during the Troubles?

But the big issue that is sure to play out at PMQs is the vexed question of national independence. Theresa May told the Cabinet yesterday of her plans to write the ‘historic’ letter triggering the Article 50 Brexit process next Wednesday. She wants ‘an independent UK prospering outside the EU’, she told colleagues. Isn’t there a party that has ‘UK Independence’ in its title? Will the PM dare to declare, with a Farage-iste flourish, that March 29 will be Independence Day?

And Scottish independence will certainly be on the agenda, not least as at 2pm Holyrood is expected to vote for the Section 30 order requesting a fresh referendum. May could cite Scots Labour leader Kezia Dugdale from the PLP warning that the best way to ‘deliver for working people is from the Government benches’. She could cite Corbyn’s line that he was ‘absolutely fine’ about a second referendum. She could even quote Ruth Davidson’s jibe that ‘a big Tory did it’.

The SNP’s Mhairi Black caused a bit of a kerfuffle with her line yesterday that Scotland’s 59 MPs can be outvoted by London’s 73. The FT's Seb Payne was quick to point out that London’s population is 40% larger than Scotland's, yet it has just 20% more MPs.

May’s holding line in rejecting a second indyref before Brexit is that “now is not the right time”. Which is exactly the phrase being used by Treasury minister Jane Ellison (in a letter seen by the Telegraph) to rule out a pensions tax raid to make up for the £2bn black hole cause by Hammond’s Budget U-turn. So where will the money for the NHS come from? And after last week's debacle, will Corbyn dare tread on that ground?


Relations between Tom Watson and Len McCluskey plumbed new depths yesterday as the Unite boss used a HuffPost UK blog to launch a withering attack on his former friend. McCluskey said the deputy Labour leader operated in “a world of skulduggery, smears and secret plots”. Watson behaved like he was in ‘a low-budget remake of The Godfather’, he added. (Funnily enough, I know of one Labour MP and devout Corbynsceptic who actually does have the movie’s theme tune as his phone ringtone).

In a particularly savage dig, McCluskey said he’d suppported Watson publicly and privately “when he was under great personal strain because of his courageous campaign against the Murdoch empire”. On the point of substance, he also denied he was “in cahoots” with Momentum’s Jon Lansman in a bid to take over Labour.

But Watson responded: “I am sorry that Len McCluskey has to use personal insults instead of arguing his case. It would be more productive if he would state categorically that Unite will never fund Momentum” (something the Unite general secretary failed to rule out in his blog, Watson allies say).

As it happens, we have published a video of McCluskey from 2012, with John McDonnell seated beside him, telling a meeting of leftwing activists about ‘entryism’ and how to ‘take over the party’ for the Left. Len’s campaign insist he was talking about getting more trade unionists into Labour. But Watson tells us: “These remarks provide further evidence that there is a long-standing plot by the hard left to take control of the Labour Party by employing the same methods Jon Lansman outlined”.

I can’t see Watson sitting alongside Corbyn in PMQs today after all this. As I reported on Monday, at the PLP they sat side-by-side, “like two skittles not ever touching”.


As well as being Len McCluskey’s public enemy number one, Watson’s day job happens to be as Shadow Culture, Media and Sport Secretary. And today his team are highlighting the way working class kids are being excluded from acting and playwright jobs. Shadow ministers Gloria de Piero and Tracy Brabin (one a former TV reporter, the other a former Coronation St actress) are holding their first evidence session into a Labour inquiry into access into the performing arts.

Among those giving evidence will be Eastenders actress Michelle Collins, but also the best political playwright of our times (miles better than the turgid David Hare), James Graham, whose play ‘This House’ has wowed audiences, including many MPs. Gloria has written a HuffPost blog in which she points out new figures show that 51% of actors surveyed were from privileged backgrounds and just 16% were from a working class background.

Speaking of meritocracies, George Osborne is under fresh attack from Watson today over his impending Evening Standard editorship. Watson has asked culture minister Matt Hancock to avoid conflicts of interest in dealing with his “former boss and powerful patron” (as it happens Hancock’s links to Osborne weren’t enough for him to secure one northern Tory candidacy he once sought, and he only narrowly won West Suffolk). Osborne has written to his constituents pointing out “one of the greatest newspaper editors ever, CP Scott, combined editing the Manchester Guardian with being an MP”.


Watch Republican senator Jeff Flake (great name) ask Trump’s Supreme Court nominee: “Would you rather fight one horse-sized duck or a hundred duck-sized horses?”


One of the more bizarre PMQs moments in recent months came when the PM appeared to agree with Tory MP Fiona Bruce that Christians were ‘fearful’ about talking about Christmas at work. Well, as the other key religious date in the calendar approaches, there’s a fresh fake row over Easter eggs.

Yes, Cadbury’s has been forced to slap down claims that its British eggs are Halal-certified. The firm’s Twitter account has spent hours taking on far-right accounts who point to a photo of a company employee holding a certificate showing its products are halal-certified. A Cadbury’s insider tells HuffPost UK the picture is many years old and originates from the firm’s Asia-Pacifc market. It points out none of its UK products are Halal.

Meanwhile, the Times puts on its front page an exclusive that Cadbury, along with Mars, Nestle and Kelloggs (yes a cereal firm - a clue to how sweet its breakfasts are) have warned they won’t be able to hit a Government target of cutting sugar in their products by 20% by 2020. May is already under fire for abandoning bits of Cameron’s anti- child obesity plans. What will she do about this? Only yesterday, we learned record numbers of kids are having milk teeth extracted because of sugary diets….


The consultation on the Government’s plans for a new school funding formula ends today. Pretty soon, the PM is going to have to decide whether to make concessions to Tory MPs furious at the way the changes will leave many of their local pupils worse off (as well as the backlash from parents in London and other Labour-dominated areas).

A little noticed moment in PMQs last week was when May was asked by backbencher Jeremy Quin if she favoured a ‘minimum’ funding compromise, that would keep the new system but ensure a floor below which no school would fall (the PM said ‘we will be looking at it carefully’). That argument is backed up by today’s IFS study warning that new pressures mean could leave 1,000 schools with extra cuts of up to 7% after 2020.

The minimum funding idea is further backed by the National Governors Association today which says that the new system will tackle unfairness but adds ‘we need more per pupil in every school’. Governors responding to a BBC questionnaire warned the cuts could force a shortening of the school day, fewer subjects in the curriculum and reduced mental health support. The latter contrasts with the PM’s own big speech on the topic earlier this year.

If you’re reading this on the web, sign-up HERE to get the WaughZone delivered to your inbox.

Got something you want to share? Please send any stories/tips/quotes/pix/plugs/gossip to Paul Waugh (, Ned Simons (, and Owen Bennett (

Follow HuffPost on Facebook and Twitter:

Get Huffington Post on the Go
Know something we don't? E-mail us at
  |  Forward  |  MANAGE MY ALERTS
Huffington Post, 770 Broadway, New York, NY 10003


All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.

Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.