Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to

Also in

Waugh Room briefing: June 1 2015

The five things you need to know on Monday June 1 2015...

Parliament is back in earnest. And so too is The Waugh Room, the original morning briefing on what’s moving in Westminster and Whitehall (and now occasionally Washington).
Readers new and old are welcome aboard. Don’t forget my email is now

michael gove


The absence of the British Bill of Rights from the Queen’s Speech last week caught everyone’s eye last week. The problem of electoral arithmetic (‘Runnymeade Tory’ civil liberties rebels in the Commons, a Government minority in the Lords) was one factor. Another, less glamorous but equally true, was the fact that Michael Gove is new to his brief and wants more time to get the policy right.

But the behind-the-scenes battle over the European Convention on Human Rights is where the real meat is. The Telegraph splashes that David Cameron has ruled out pulling out of the Convention despite objections from Gove and Theresa May.
Gove and May (like Chris Grayling in the last Parliament) think that withdrawal could be ‘the only solution’ to restoring the supremacy of British courts over Strasbourg judges.

But No.10, ever mindful of looking ‘extreme’ among moderate voters, disagrees. A senior Government source says: "Withdrawal is not going to happen. Michael Gove and Theresa May think it's the only solution but David Cameron's clear this is off the table.”

Last week, the Sun - which was furious at the Queen’s Speech delay - also pointed out that the real story was that Downing Street was against withdrawal from the Convention. Grayling’s own policy failed to make the Tory manifesto. No.10 sources say that folks should wait for the actual proposals and ‘not be too hasty’ to judge at this stage. A source tells me this morning: 'our manifesto pledge is absolutely clear and everyone in Government is signed up to it'.

Germany, which is being helpful on EU renegotiation, could offer a way out. Never forget the German constitutional court takes precedence over Strasbourg even though Berlin is a full signatory to the ECHR.

The stakes are high. If the PM can get a hard-hitting reform of the UK’s control over human rights, this could outweigh doubts that he’s failed to get bigger repatriation of powers from Brussels. And Tory focus groups show that more voters are more worried about our impotence over Abu Qatada than about interminable Brussels rows.

EU reform and human rights are separate issues, but ahead of a 2017 referendum, every little helps.


Priti Patel has been on the airwaves pushing the Government’s fast-tracked childcare policy (the top line is it will be trialled in September 2016, not 2017 as planned). The PM himself, Whitehall’s very own Daddy DayCare, is staging a visit to meet some parents and pre-schoolers.

The accelerated timetable for the Childcare Bill is a key part of the sense of urgency and momentum No.10 wants to maintain since May 7. It’s also a key part of Cameron’s central theme of being in touch with bread-and-butter issues millions of voters care about, and the nightmare of juggling and funding childcare is all too real for many.

The politics are important too. George Osborne is determined to reach as many working mums as possible, extending the scheme beyond the poorest so those with joint incomes of upto £150k can get help. Just as Gordon Brown appealed to the squeezed middle with tax credits, so too this equally political of Chancellors wants to touch those not on the breadline.
As Gavin Kelly of the Resolution Foundation puts it today, this extension of the welfare state under a Tory government would have been ‘inconceivable even 10 years ago’.

The FT however has a story that will upset some parents: IDS has told officials to draft plans to axe child benefit for families with more than two kids. The other option is to cut first-child benefit to the level of other siblings too.


The first rule of Labour leadership infighting is that you don’t talk about Labour leadership infighting. That’s why you’ll have each of the contenders pretending that their barbs against each other are not really aimed at anyone in particular, that this is not about personalities but Tony Benn’s famous ‘ishoos’. Yvette Cooper tried that tack on Marr yesterday, but the digs at her opponents were not so much ‘thinly veiled’ (a mainstay of the Lobby Intro Jar) as crystal clear.

Cooper’s line that Labour shouldn’t be ‘stigmatising’ those on welfare was an obvious reference to Andy Burnham’s remark last week that the party shouldn’t given an ‘easy ride’ to the workshy. Similarly, her comment that Labour doesn’t have to ‘swallow the Tory manifesto’ (a point first made in her HuffPostUK blog last weekend) was an obvious attack on Liz Kendall’s backing for Free Schools and private sector knowhow.

On 5Live’s Pienaar show, Burnham took aim at Kendall’s call for 2% defence spending, pointing out it was “not wise” to make such a pledge without explaining how you were going to pay for it. I raised this point directly with Kendall last month and, given her insistence on fiscal rectitude, it was surprising that her answer was that it was upto the Government to find the money, not Labour to explain how to fund it.

Some Labour insiders also mutter that while Kendall may be the darling of the media, she is still virtually unknown ‘out there’ among Labour members. Will that be a blessing or a curse?

Burnham last night became the first to publish the 35 MPs names he needs to get on the ballot. Cooper’s camp doesn’t want to be bounced into immediately following suit and will probably get its list out later this week.

One problem with the 2010 leader race was that the Labour FightClub rules were adhered to so strictly. There were so few punch-ups between candidates that it was hard for members to see just how left-wing Ed Miliband would be (or how Blairite David would be). The 2015 race is already shaping up to be different.

The danger, of course, is that this could end up looking not like a boxing ring, but a circular firing squad.


Check out our pic of a youthful Tim Farron, complete with hat and white socks. So on trend...


Michael Fallon has been in Singapore, warning of the dangers of war in the South China Sea and how Britain can help deter it by spending enough on our military. On the sidelines of a meeting of defence ministers (the sidelines are always the best spot for a juicy quote), Fallon also fired a shot across the bows of the Treasury as much as Beijing. “Who said I’m going to be asked to cut? My job is to make sure that the armed forces have what they need to keep Britain safe. That’s what I’ll be negotiating with the Chancellor.”

The Times reported last week that the MoD had been asked to find £1bn in savings from its £36bn budget. The real battle, aka the next Comprehensive Spending Review, has already begun.
The Commons debate on the Queen’s Speech continues, with foreign affairs the topic today.


You wouldn’t like him when he’s angry. Rand Paul, the Republican libertarian and Presidential hopeful, last night claimed at temporary victory as the US Senate decided not to renew laws allowing the bulk collection of data from American citizens. “This is what we fought the Revolution over”, Paul said, somewhat improbably.

The delay in the Patriot Act is temporary but the dramatic and unusual late Sunday night sitting ensured Paul irritated more mainstream colleagues - and ensured he got the TV publicity he was seeking. Still, he looks like being the new pin-up boy for the Guardian’s campaign to overhaul NSA oversight post-Snowden. Uneasy bedfellows indeed.


George Osborne will be in the Midlands, pushing another regional ‘Powerhouse’. I see the PM has a Written Ministerial Statement on ‘cities policy’. Expect too a ‘machinery of Government’ statement.

Got something you want to share? Please send any stories/tips/quotes/pix/plugs/gossip to Paul Waugh (, Ned Simons (, Graeme Demianyk ( and Owen Benett (

You can also follow us on Twitter: @paulwaugh, @nedsimons, @graemedemianyk @owenjbennett

You're receiving the Waugh Room since you previously subscribed to Mehdi's Morning Memo. To stop receiving this newsletter, click the "unsubscribe" button at the end of this mail
Read the whole story

Follow HuffPost UK Politics on Facebook and Twitter

770 Broadway, New York, NY 10003


All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.

Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.