Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk

Also in racked.com

Disturbing Conditions Alleged at Ivanka Trump Shoe Factories

View on the web

You may have noticed we’ve been reporting on the Trump family quite a bit lately. It’s not often that presidential campaigns dovetail quite so neatly with the subjects Racked covers, but in 2016, the Trumps’ business interests are perhaps the least unusual thing about the Republican candidate.


Did you read last week’s investigation into Donald’s Chinese tie factories? Or this summer’s look at Melania’s caviar skincare line that never made it to stores? Well, today we have yet another scoop, involving allegations of potential labor violations at one of Ivanka’s shoe factories. Read it below, and stay tuned for more election-related coverage in the weeks to come.  —Julia Rubin, executive editor

Long Hours, Low Wages Alleged at Ivanka Trump Shoe Factory
Insert alt text here
Story by Spencer Woodman

In recent months, Donald Trump’s presidential campaign has deployed his daughter Ivanka to show that the family has a compassionate side, which, among other things, will push both her and her father to advocate for better lives for working people. Such ideals are easier to trumpet than to implement, however, especially when it comes to the many-tentacled global supply chain of subcontractors that the Trumps use to produce their brands.

Workers at one Chinese footwear factory that, according to US customs data available on the ImportGenius database, has made more than 130,000 pounds of Ivanka Trump-brand shoes, describe being subjected to an array of workplace indignities, some that would potentially qualify as violations of local labor law. Workers say that the factory, Xuankai Footwear Ltd., located in the Houjie area of Dongguan in China’s Pearl River Delta, required them to work lengthy shifts stretching up to 16 hours that tested and exceeded the limits of human endurance. Some workers also allege that the factory paid illegally low overtime rates and systematically delayed wage payments.

“I couldn’t do it,” said one 26-year-old worker, who had been previously employed in several other Houjie shoe factories but said he quit after mere hours at Xuankai. “I was too scared.”

Customs records show that as recently as 2014, Ivanka Trump produced shoes in the Xuankai factory through a licensing agreement with Greenwich, Connecticut-based footwear company Marc Fisher. The company also manufactures Guess and Tommy Hilfiger, as well as its eponymous Marc Fisher label. (In June of this year, luxury shoe brand Aquazurra sued Ivanka Trump and Marc Fisher for allegedly copying one of its designs. The firm calls the suit baseless, but in 2012, Gucci won a similar knockoff case against Guess and Marc Fisher.)

Marc Fisher, Guess, and Tommy Hilfiger did not respond to requests for comment about the Xuankai facility, and neither did Xuankai itself. Public relations firm Hiltzik Strategies answered a request sent to Ivanka Trump's brand, but declined to comment.

Although Ivanka Trump’s name has been absent from Xuankai shipping records since December 2014, Marc Fisher appears to have recently ordered from the factory. According to import logs available on Panjiva, a database that aggregates US customs data, Marc Fisher could well be Xuankai’s largest single American customer, as the company accounts for some 90 percent of the factory’s recorded US imports in the database.

In July, a shipment of nearly 3,000 pounds of shoes from Xuankai entered the Port of Oakland, California, listing a Connecticut address that state records identify as the headquarters of Marc Fisher Footwear. The recent shipping document did not specify exactly to which Marc Fisher brand the shoes belonged; while the “about” page on Xuankai’s website does not name Ivanka Trump, it lists Guess and “Tommy Europe,” as well as DKNY, as customers. DKNY also did not respond to requests for comment. 

Interviews with Xuankai workers were conducted during visits to more than a half-dozen factories that have produced products for Donald and Ivanka Trump in several cities along the east coast of China. The workers I spoke with at these factories described conditions that varied significantly between facilities. In contrast to Xuankai, workers at two other factories that produced for Ivanka Trump — a shoe facility run by the Huajin Group contracted through Marc Fisher and a garment factory called Hangzhou HS Fashion connected to Ivanka Trump through apparel intermediary G-III — described broad satisfaction with their employers. And, at four factories in the town of Shengzhou that produced for Donald Trump's brand, no legal violations were alleged.

Xuankai was different. Workers there told me that they were generally given only two days of rest per month and commonly worked 12-hour shifts, from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., with two one-hour meal breaks. A former employee surnamed Tian — who had quit the factory just days before, but still carried his Xuankai badge — said that in his months at the factory, he would sometimes have to work from 8 a.m. until 1 or 2 the following morning, with two hours of breaks during the long shifts. “We got to sleep for six hours,” said Tian. “If we worked until after three in the morning, we could start the next day at 9:15.”

When I showed Tian photographs of Ivanka Trump shoes on my phone, he said he did not recognize the shiny, uppercase logo lettering, but that he had worked on very similar-looking shoes during his time in the factory.

“We got to sleep for six hours. If we worked until after three in the morning, we could start the next day at 9:15.”

Another former worker said that, when Xuankai was rushing to fill an order, he would work all day and throughout the night, stopping only for meal breaks. He lasted several months before quitting. “It’s a garbage factory,” he said. A 23-year-old worker saw a relationship between the long hours and the demands of the factory’s foreign customers. “If the client needs [an order] quick, we need to work longer,” he said. “I usually work until eleven o’clock or midnight.” (One Xuankai employee, who worked in the factory’s storage area, said he worked only ten-hour days. Desiring a higher income, he said that he wished the company would give him more overtime.)

One worker from Guizhou province told me that he had worked long hours each day for the entire month of July without a single day off. And, although it was mid-August when we spoke, he said he had not yet received payment even for the work he had done in early July. Workers at Xuankai said that the factory routinely withholds their wages for up to eight weeks in order to, one worker speculated, make it more difficult for employees to leave the factory. “They will keep one month’s salary as a deposit,” said the worker.

“Chinese law is very strict when it comes to paying employees on time,” explains Grace Yang, an attorney with a focus on Chinese employment law at the Seattle law firm Harris Moure. She notes that Chinese labor regulations can vary between jurisdictions, but that “seven or eight weeks to get payment — that sounds late by any standard.”

Yang says that, while she cannot know offhand which exact rules apply to the Xuankai factory, 12-hour workdays with so few rest days per month “could exceed the statutory maximum” of overtime hours. “It has to be reasonable,” she says, “and that sounds unreasonable to me.”

As a “small group leader” at the factory, one worker said he could earn roughly 4,400 yuan a month, or just over $650, for his long hours, well above China's average monthly migrant wage of 3,072 yuan. But an entry-level worker at Xuankai said that, even with the factory’s long overtime hours, he makes roughly 3,000 yuan a month. The Xuankai workers said the factory paid an overtime wage of 10 yuan per hour. The hourly minimum wage in Dongguan is 14.4 yuan, according to China Labor Bulletin, and employers are generally required to pay non-managerial workers time-and-a-half for overtime hours.

Tian asserted that the factory’s overtime rate was illegal; as per Yang, “That sounds really low.”

Tian has been employed in a number of different shoe factories in Dongguan, he said, and all were bad, but Xuankai was among the worst. “We couldn’t get enough rest or sleep, so we were not in good condition to work,” Tian said. “I couldn’t bear it anymore.”

Ad from our sponsor
Feature
What Are We Really Seeing When We Look in a Mirror?
Insert alt text here

Last month, at a sample sale in Soho, I pulled on some high waist straight-leg AG jeans. They felt like they fit like a glove, but when I walked out of the makeshift fitting room into the fluorescent floor of the temporary retail space, my reflection in the disposable dorm-room mirror was so wonky that I had no idea how the pants looked. I looked in another mirror, which elongated me into a string bean. I tried a third; it created a convex bulge somewhere between my shoulder and my waist. I left empty-handed; the mirror had failed me and the retailer alike.
Mirrors, however well they’re made, are a flawed technology, capable of playing tricks on even the most clear-eyed observer. We routinely see ourselves in reverse, from a distance, and, depending on the time of day, shorter, taller, thinner, fatter, darker, lighter, younger, older, and so on. And I don’t trust them. There seems to me to be no consistency between the fingers, skin, eyes, and thighs in one mirror, and the ones I see in another. I have a general idea of what I look like, of course; I don’t appear to myself as a complete stranger. But I have been bewildered by what I’ve seen, in both good ways and bad.

Mirrors, however well they’re made, are a flawed technology

And that’s the rub. It’s not a matter of blanket positives or negatives, of extreme vanity or mind-bending dysmorphia. The range of possible mirror images seems too vast for me to take any of my reflections at face value. There is simply no way I can look as good and as bad and as familiar and as foreign as I do to myself every day, in mirrors of all shapes and sizes.

If you accept that you contain multitudes, the only reasonable position towards your reflection is one of partial disbelief.

Keep reading this story here >>
Did a friend forward you this email? Sign up for the Racked email newsletter.
View on the web
From around the web
A selection from the editors at Racked
alt text here
Up Close With Nasty Gal's Sophia Amoruso
Learn about her new book and what her first high-end designer purchase was.
Read more
Ad from our sponsor
Facebook
---------------------------

All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.


Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at questions@spamdex.co.uk. Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See https://archive.org. Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of http://spam.abuse.net Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.