Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk

Also in racked.com

Your Voting Day Outfit Matters

View on the web

This morning, while I was editing this great piece about why it’s not just okay but actually great to care about what you wear to vote, Eliza turned around in her seat and announced what her friend was wearing: all female designers and her mom’s backpack. Soon after, I saw Amina’s fantastic floral pantsuit pop up on Twitter, and then Kelsey arrived in the office channeling ‘80-era HRC. All of which made me hungry for more.

I love that on this momentous occasion, among the shattering glass, we’re confident enough to acknowledge the power of what we wear! Below are just a few of the women who shared their Election Day outfits with us. Look for more across our social channels today. And if you haven’t already, suit up and vote! Britt Aboutaleb, editor-in-chief

What Women Are Wearing to Head to the Polls
Insert alt text here
Photo: Instagram @carolinecala

I just became a citizen last year, so this is my first presidential election. I was going to wear my American flag shirt, but instead wore a blouse my grandma and I both have. We vote as a family unit. It's silk, so I knew the sticker would stay on well and not pull at the fabric. I also wore pearls my mom got me. She can't vote since she’s not a citizen, and I wanted to bring something of hers with me into the booth. —Polly, 25, New York

My friends and I decided a couple of days ago to all wear pantsuits. We called each other and made the decision for impact. One of them is trying to find a white pantsuit, but I still will not wear white past Labor Day, even for my Hillary. —Dee, 52, California

I took my cue from this vintage photo of Hillary from the ‘80s. It's power-dressing with an edge, and communicates what I want to present on Election Day 2016: confidence, optimism, independence. —Kelsey, 32, New York

Mom and I both wore blue pantsuits. I wore gold shoes for extra luck! —Haley, 26, Massachusetts

I wore my “The Future Is Female” T-shirt from Otherwild. I actually think the future is non-binary, but I like how you can interpret it that tomorrow a female will have been elected president. The future of the American presidency is female. —Elena, 25, California

Insert alt text here
Photo: Twitter @emscashmoney

I wore my baby (even though my husband usually wears him when we're out together) because I want to be able to tell him when he's older that he watched his mama vote for America's first female president. And also the best pantsuit-like outfit I could muster (black pants, shirt, blazer). —Amanda, 32, New York

Voted absentee, but currently wearing my Notorious RBG shirt to channel nasty women and the best of American politics. —Molly, 23, Pennsylvania

I’m getting ready for a long (and possibly cold) line, so comfortable pants and a warm, cozy sweater! —Christine, 56, New Hampshire

Last night, I went to LOFT and TJ Maxx looking for an affordable pantsuit. None to be found! It should be noted, of course, that there were several poly-cotton blend Ivanka Trump label items for sale at the Maxx. I finally went to a Salvation Army near my house and picked up a handsome black ’90s pantsuit. My first! I festooned it with a Medusa pin my sister made because I've found that when pleas to listen to me fail, men are easily intimidated by my direct eye contact. I'm stone cold! I also wore a poorly Photoshopped glass ceiling pin I bought on the street by school because it made me laugh.  —Claire, 25, New York

Ad from our sponsor
Yes, It’s Okay to Care About What You Wear to Vote
Insert alt text here
Story by Zan Romanoff

When my mother goes to the polls today to cast her ballot for Hillary Clinton, she will be wearing a necklace her own mother hand-beaded, “a relic of the 1970's and a good time in her life.” My grandmother was born four years before white women got the right to vote, and died in the summer of 2013. For most of her life she was not particularly political. “She didn’t see the point,” my mother says. “Men in power were a fixed thing in her experience.”

My aunt, her other daughter, lives in Utah, where she organizes for undocumented workers’ rights. Her voting outfit includes a Nasty Woman shirt she ordered online. She’s already asked her boyfriend to come over and photograph her before she heads out to the polls.

That their tributes are fashion-focused is fitting: My grandmother was an artist and a fashion illustrator, a woman with a fine hand and a good eye and a keen sense of grace and beauty. She lived well into her nineties, and I rarely saw her without her thick, waist-length gray hair in a neat updo, carefully clipped into place with turquoise and silver.

When I first wondered what I’d wear on election day, my initial instinct was to feel ashamed of the question, as if it was shallow and small-minded to treat a matter of national and international significance, the exercise of my political rights and freedoms, the same way I do parties and dates. So I was thrilled and comforted to see other women wondering the same across Twitter and Instagram, posting pictures of shirts they’d ordered specifically for the occasion and sourcing the necessary pieces for an all-white outfit in tribute to the suffragettes. On Facebook, Pantsuit Nation offered a safe space defined by a weighty silhouette.

If it was a small instinct, it was also a common one: An urge to find some way to express that there is still joy and energy to be found, even at the end of an unbelievably long, ugly, and often horrifyingly racist, sexist and xenophobic election cycle—and that it can be found and expressed specifically by celebrating in a manner traditionally coded as feminine, which the world takes such great pains to dismiss and degrade.

Sarah Enni, who lives in Los Angeles, is also planning on wearing a Nasty Woman shirt to vote. Hers from by Austin designer Lindsey Eyth. “I bought it in red, with rose gold shiny foil lettering, because brash and clash and notice me exercising my fucking right,” she says. “My dad used to tell me that if I want to be taken seriously, I have to dress like a serious person. I don't always look "serious" (my red Nasty Woman t-shirt is going to make my purple hair really pop), but I do look intentional.”

Voting early hasn’t stopped people from rocking a Look to do it: Lauren Bates cast her ballot in Tampa on Halloween in “my thrown-together Snow White costume because I wanted to be my most feminine self. Full skirt, bow in hair, fresh manicure.” There’s such power to be claimed in femme presentation, in voting for a woman while “looking like a woman,” that some people have poll-only outfits ready. Joanna Ware will be out in Boston “in a pencil skirt and blazer and cute, ass-kicking heeled boot,” before switching over to “jeans and a Planned Parenthood Hillary t-shirt for GOTV work in New Hampshire. Not fancy,” she admits. “But there's work to do.”

Even women who love to get dressed up are practical enough to know when an outfit is not the answer. Ashe Farley is busy raising her young cousins, and will cast her ballot in Mayking, Kentucky, in “pajama pants and Ugg boots and whatever cleanish t-shirt I can scrape off the floor,” she says. Instead of using fashion to pump herself up, she’s got a playlist of strong Southern women at the ready: Beyonce, The Dixie Chicks and Miley Cyrus will accompany her to vote, and gear her up to post to Facebook, to “tell my conservative town that… I'm not voting for Trump, after pretending not to care about politics for two years so no one burned a cross on my yard.”

Social media has played a role in many women’s desire to dress the part on election day. “Like, I don't think wearing my t-shirt in Williamsburg is gonna change any hearts or minds,” Maris Kreizman, a New Yorker, notes, “but I like that I can broadcast my values in a big way online. Make my former high school friends feel uncomfy on Facebook.”

And after an election cycle in which Hillary supporters have expressed discomfort with and even fear of supporting their preferred candidate publicly — and, with the voter suppression and intimidation tactics being deployed nationally, with some good reason — there’s fierce power in claiming at least the real estate of your own body, and declaring that it will express itself however it damn well pleases.

“A noticeable election outfit is just one way to fight back. Women are often judged for the performativity of their clothing, but they're also judged by it, and I think this is a glorious opportunity for us all to use our clothes to scream F*&K THE HATERS. WE ARE HERE AND WE ARE VOTING,” notes Adrienne Celt, who voted early in Tucson, Arizona, and has been rocking her I Voted sticker as a conversation piece ever since.

There are plenty of women who aren’t planning on wearing anything in particular today, for a host of reasons, some but not all of them tied to race. Samantha Powell, a black woman who lives in Los Angeles, notes that “there is a general ambivalence when it comes to Hillary Clinton, especially for [non-white] women in their 30s and older… Many will never forget, and some will never be able to forgive, the super predator moment despite the fact that she has apologized. People change… but some wounds are deep and the ghost of that pain lingers. So the idea of wearing a pantsuit, which some now see as her signature look, causes feelings ranging from discomfort to nausea.” She points to the #GirlIGuessImWithHer hashtag as a useful collection of feelings in this vein.

Powell is also troubled by the symbolism of dressing like the suffragettes, “No one is questioning the vast importance of the work that those women did but the fact that some of the leaders of the movement were virulent racists is, at least for me, one of the first things to spring to mind when I think of that movement,” she says.

This is not to say that all women of color are abstaining from election outfits: Weezie, an Alabama woman and Mvskoke Native, is planning to go to the polls in full regalia with her grandmother; Kristine Wylls, whose Twitter bio identifies her as “brownish” (she’s Cherokee), is hand-coloring a Make America Native shirt to wear, even though she feels that in her “small, conservative town,” that may be a “death wish.” The reasons to wear and not wear, to celebrate and not celebrate, to vote joyfully or solemnly, whole-heartedly or with reservations, are as numerous and diverse as the women who hold them.

It’s easy to dismiss caring about clothing as a shallow, materialist, capitalist enterprise—and sure, fine, to an extent, it is. But it can also be a remarkably tender expression of resistance, a reminder that caring for and celebrating our own bodies and freedoms comes in myriad forms, and can be as utilitarian as pulling a polling lever and as ornate and baroque, as useless and beautiful, as painting our nails and our mouths.

Clothes are commercial objects, but as soon as they enter our wardrobes they start to get imbued with personal meaning, and when we put them on our bodies we imagine the ways they’ll mediate between us and the world, translating what’s going on inside of our heads and hearts into something publicly legible. We plan outfits for so many milestones, personal and professional—is it really so strange to think that we want to be intentional and deliberate about how we show up to the political ones, too?

News
Taylor Swift Just Told Us Who She’s Voting for With a Sweater
Taylor Swift in line to vote.

In her roughly 12 million Instagram posts declaring love for specific supermodels, lesser pop stars, and (since deleted) British actors-slash-DJs, Taylor Swift has never publicly endorsed a particular presidential candidate. Aside from the uncertain fate of our country, it’s been the number one most important question of the 2016 election cycle.

Until now!

Keep reading this story here >>
Did a friend forward you this email? Sign up for the Racked email newsletter.
View on the web
From around the web
A selection from the editors at Racked

---------------------------

All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.


Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at questions@spamdex.co.uk. Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See https://archive.org. Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of http://spam.abuse.net Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.