Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk

Also in racked.com

Less Is No Longer More

View on the web

Minimalism has dominated the aesthetic landscape for much of recent memory, but those neutral-colored days may be over. Jennifer Wright takes us back to the French Revolution to explain why embellishment is once again on the upswing, and why you diehard normcore enthusiasts may need to make some room in your clean lines for ruffles and rhinestones. 

And next, following the news of Nasty Gal's filing for bankruptcy, Eliza Brooke takes a look back at what may have gone wrong. —Stephanie Talmadge, social media editor

Embellishment Killed the French Aristocrats — Now It’s Back
Insert alt text here
Story by Jennifer Wright

Embellishment is what got the French Aristocrats killed. Well, okay, not just embellishment. There were a lot of financial excesses typified by Rococo aristocrats that didn’t endear them to the disenfranchised populace. Behaving like filthy rich jerks who openly hated peasants is what got them killed. However, covering their clothing with gems and glittering gold threads didn’t help.

And the aristocrats embellished everything. Styles before the revolution were known for their excessive adornment. You’ll see foppishly dressed aristocrats (sometimes called "macaronis") wearing jackets covered with bows, gems, lace, ruffles and tons of gilded or silver thread. That kind of embellishment looks great! It telegraphs wealth from a mile away! The poor did not appreciate that since they were starving and wearing rags. The people who ultimately rose up against the aristocrats referred to themselves as the "sans culottes," meaning that they wore workmen’s pants, not fancy lace breeches.

Insert alt text here
Marie Antoinette. Photo: Universal History Archive/Getty Images

Following the French Revolution, the directoire style became popular. While once powerful women and men had garments that would be appear as bedazzled as your great aunt’s favorite sweatshirt (if only your great aunt had Elizabeth Taylor’s jewelry collection to work with), after the revolution, anyone in power adopted far simpler styles. Men wore work pants and suit coats. Inspired by the Roman Republic, the women dressed in plain white muslin gowns generally cut with an empire waist. A powerful woman went from looking like this to looking like this (all of the pictures of women from this period look like they’re your surly teenage daughter who hates having her picture taken, but this one looks that way the most.) It wasn’t chic to look too elaborately adorned anymore. Simplicity was the essence of power and elegance now.

This basically remained the rule for the next 200 years. The post-revolutionary period in France is the divide in history where people go from looking, more or less, like they’re in a costume drama to looking, more or less, like they could pass if they were dropped into modern society.

That’s not to say that clothing was never elaborately embellished in the next hundred years, but it was confined largely to the theater. Showgirl costumes, for instance, which were intended to be eye-catching, were covered with crystals, gems and ruffles. (Here are some great examples.)

Insert alt text here
Showgirls circa 1930. Photo: Hulton Archive/Stringer/Getty Images

Those who wore that much elaborate adornment outside were considered to be at least a little eccentric — like your great aunt who has bedazzled all her sweaters with her cats’s names. Don’t get me wrong, I love that (and so do the felines Meow, Whiskers, and Bernice), but it wasn’t the style adopted by the wealthy and powerful. They, perhaps at least still a little mindful of the lessons of the revolution, tended towards understated, elegant pieces.

There was, however, a brief foray into extreme embellishment in the 1990s. During that time, brands like Dolce & Gabbana and Chanel embellished their clothing. That period didn’t last too long, though. It was stopped, either by the grunge movement or by Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy’s understated elegance, depending upon whom you ask.

And it didn’t resurface until right about now. Embellished clothing is having a huge moment. The Blondes, which make dazzlingly embellished bodysuits and garments covered with Preciosa Crystal components, note that "we sometimes refer to our clients as modern day showgirls." However, its clients are working with far more than a showgirl’s budget — one of the Blonde’s bodysuits retails for $7,500. The price point remains similar with a lot of Libertine’s beautiful beaded coats this season, which are covered in crystals and retail for around $10,000. Similarly priced are these Dolce & Gabbana outfits that feature dresses spelling out "I am a princess" in glittery thread and pearls.

Even Marie Antoinette didn’t go that far.

Insert alt text here
A 1993 Chanel fashion show. Photo: Rindoff Petroff/Castel/Contributor/Getty Images

The Blondes note that one of their inspirations is 90s high fashion. Styles haven’t been this decadent since the early 90s — and they might not have been quite that decadent then. At first glance, it might seem odd that this is the year when these trends are returning at a higher price point than ever.

But then again, the 90s also seem to have returned in the form of two presidential candidates. This race included, bizarrely, a populist candidate who lives in a literal tower covered in gold, which is the actual kind of gaudy excess that got French aristocrats killed. Maybe his popularity with the common man seems to have given us permission to embrace things that might quite recently have been seen as a little over the top. We could just have decided that if a man beloved by rural America can live in a golden tower and cover himself with shiny fabrics, then we all can.

Perhaps, too, 2016 was the year when people became tired of the "less is more philosophy" that dominated the post-recession years. Maybe people grew tired of hiding their extravagant purchases in brown bags, an option offered by high-end department stores after the recession. The style pendulum that swung strongly toward understatement in the first half of the decade may be rebounding. Despite claims that the country is falling apart, the uptick in the economy could be being felt enough for fashion to lend itself to frivolity.

Ad from our sponsor
Fashion
Nasty Gal Just Filed for Bankruptcy. How Did It Get Here?
Sophia Amoruso.

Just a few years ago, Nasty Gal was one of the hottest success stories in the retail world. Founder Sophia Amoruso, who branded herself as an unconventional businesswoman with choppy micro-bangs and a badass attitude, was heralded for having an eye for what young women wanted and a smart approach to e-commerce.

On Wednesday, the Los Angeles-based company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

For all the champagne popped along the way, Nasty Gal has seen its share of bad press, including legal missteps, layoffs, and a reportedly high churn rate among executives. Its fiery rise seemed to cool from a consumer standpoint, too.

Writing for Racked in April 2015, Lauren Sherman expressed concern that the company might not have what it takes to stay relevant with the young folk for more than a few years; trend-focused retailers with distinct identities face a tough road to begin with, and the speed of the Internet has shrunk their lifespans even further.

Bankruptcy sounds dire, but this doesn’t mean that Nasty Gal is going under for good. By filing for Chapter 11 protection, the brand now has a chance to restructure and get its business back in order.

In the meantime, here’s a look back at Nasty Gal’s road to… well, either recovery or ruin.

See the full timeline of Nasty Gal here >>
Did a friend forward you this email? Sign up for the Racked email newsletter.

---------------------------

All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.


Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to questions@spamdex.co.uk | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at questions@spamdex.co.uk. Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See https://archive.org. Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of http://spam.abuse.net Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.

View on the web
From around the web
A selection from the editors at Racked
Woman in a dark blazer.
Where to Shop for Work Clothes
Your weekday wardrobe doesn’t have to be boring.
Read more