Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to

Also in

It's Truly Time to 'Ask Her More'

View on the web

Facebook Twitter Instagram
‘Who Are You Wearing?’ Is Dead, Long Live ‘Who Are You Wearing?’
By Meredith Haggerty
Photo: Under Armour
Photo: Imeh Akpanudosen/NBC/ Getty Images

In 1995, when dirty-souled angel Joan Rivers first asked some unsuspecting celebrity “Who are you wearing?” it was a fairly legitimate question. Or at least the way it was phrased was new, and it worked. Clothes were being worn, designers were getting credit, and fans didn’t have to wonder, “Hey, who made that dress?”

But the question quickly transformed from one of many to the ur-question; the raison d’être for red carpet interviews and possibly celebrity culture as a whole. Red carpet walkers became human billboards for Gucci or Galliano or old Gap turtlenecks. The question would be deployed and answered and then one celebrity would be dismissed so another could march up to Joan and repeat the process, like an assembly line for saying “Balenciaga.” It was boring af.

Recently, pushback against the question — long a cultural punchline, burned by the New York Times as "improper grammar" — started to come from celebrities themselves. With the “Ask Her More” initiative, famous women like Reese Witherspoon and Shonda Rhimes are demanding the chance to talk about other things outside of what’s hanging off their bodies.

The #AskHerMore celebrities are right to want to use their limited red carpet time for a wider breadth of things (of course they are, they’re led by perfect human Amy Poehler). If they’re asking for more and better questions, you can bet we’re going to get good-ass answers. Not to pat our culture on the back, as we know it’s often horrifying, but we actually have some really cool famous people it would interesting to hear different answers from. If I only had a few minutes to talk to Issa Rae or Meryl Streep or Chrissy Metz or Gina Rodriguez (all Globe nominees), their outfits probably wouldn’t come up — but that doesn’t mean it’s not a valid question.

Yup, hi, welcome to Racked, clothing still matters. A designer’s career can be made by an awards show appearance, and stylists and fashion are as important a part of Hollywood glamour as poorly chosen award show hosts and terrifyingly determined PR people. Plus, people care; we here at this website care a whole bunch.

So just as famouses try to reject the conversation, E! and the broadcast networks have doubled down, coming up with new and inventive ways ask the exact same thing. From the mani cam (truly begging for a flip of the middle finger, which it got from Peggy Olsen herself) to 360-degree cameras that use the technology from The Matrix to capture every inch of a look, the Giuliana Seacrests of the world are determined to know all there is to know about what the cast of Empire uses to hide their nudity.

But here’s the thing: Yes, it’s a very valid question — it’s just not one celebrities need to answer personally. We don’t need or want to get this information from our TVs anymore; we can get it everywhere.

In 2017, and for a few years now, if you really want to know “who” a particular actor or singer or Food Network personality is wearing, you can just check their Instagram. Or their Snapchat. Or their stylist’s Instagram, or their stylist’s Snapchat. You can also check Twitter or Facebook or the celebrity’s personal branded content platform, or any social media account belonging to the designer, who will probably share the celebrity’s own post or have a post be shared by said celebrity or both. Also there are 10,000 unaffiliated social media accounts and websites (including this one, here for you), happily repeating the names that publicists are forwarding them. By the time Greta Gerwig or Bella Thorne or Knob Kardashian shows up to tell the cameras which designer made her look so fancy, we can sing along at home.

In 2017, and for a few years now, if you really want to know “who” a particular actor or singer or Food Network personality is wearing, you can just check their Instagram.

Famous people are only just okay as PR flacks, but luckily most of their work is done by the time a picture has been snapped. You don’t actually have to hear your favorite actress say a brand’s name to want to know more. I’ve never heard Kim Kardashian say the world "Revolve" (unless the question was “What does the world do around you?”), but thanks to the internet, I know that she’s a fan of their stuff. Cutting the question from Ross Matthews’s script doesn’t mean it won’t be answered. It’s already been answered, in an easily shareable, highly clickable, fully shoppable format.

So why does the question remain, even when it totally doesn’t?

Well, there’s only so much depth that can be achieved in the span of a two-minute interview with the third lead on a CBS procedural, especially when the questioner is trying to keep one eye open for Amy Schumer or Leonardo DiCaprio or the second lead on a CBS procedural. And as the “fun facts” that scroll underneath the scene outside the Whatever Memorial Theater prove year after year, network prep is both oddly thorough and thoroughly inane.

“Who are you wearing?” isn’t for us at home, and it isn’t for up-and-coming designers, it’s for the people asking and answering the question. It’s a shorthand that says, “Hello, you here at this event,” “Yes, thank you, I am here at this event, here is the fact I brought in exchange.” “Thank you, you can go now.”

Joan Rivers herself argued that celebrities appreciated the question. “They’re nervous,” she explained, “They haven’t eaten for three days. They’re trying to remember who the damn designer is. Their hair is held together with extensions. You can’t ask them anything difficult!” That might have been true once, but now we’re all clamoring for more, stars included, and getting our designer information from the internet, like Americans. And anyways, won’t it be so much more fun to watch everyone try?

Ad from our sponsor
Just One Thing
These Socks Are the Perfect Length to Wear With Ankle Boots
Insert alt text here

& Other Stories Shiny Rib Socks, $12

I’m a staunch supporter of real socks — none of this no-show scammer business — which is why I’m always looking for a good pair to wear with flats and ankle boots. Ankle boots can be tough, because they need to be just the right length: long enough to not slip off your foot, but short enough to not cause any extra bunching around the calf.

A friend gifted me a pair of socks from & Other Stories that are this exact ideal length, and now I’m hooked. The cut is similar to Happy Socks, which I also love, but the colors and patterns on the & Other Stories pairs are a little more in line with my style: pretty pale blues and creams, and a lot of neutrals.

They’re a little pricey, but my favorite style is the Ribbed Silk Sock ($17); the Shiny Rib Socks ($12) are cheaper and a bit more fun. —Tiffany Yannetta, shopping director

More good stuff to read today
Ad from our sponsor
From around the web
A selection from the editors at Racked
A woman wearing a bracelet.
How to Clasp a Bracelet by Yourself Without Losing Your Mind
Clasping a bracelet solo is a style challenge that never fails to test your patience.
Read more
A woman in a down coat.
The Best Things to Buy (on Sale!) in January
These five categories are best purchased now.
Read more

All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.

Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.