Spamdex - Spam Archive

Report spam

Send in your spam and get the offenders listed

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the spam you receive to

Also in

Why Beyonce's Legs Always Look #Flawless on Stage

View on the web

Facebook Twitter Instagram
How Many Pairs of Tights Does It Take to Put on a Halftime Show?
by Stephanie Talmadge
Insert alt text here

Some people watch the Super Bowl because of football. Other people watch it so they can tweet about the once-good-but-increasingly-bad commercials. Others still watch it solely for the halftime show, an event that in recent years has gifted us with Left Shark and Beyoncé rightfully overshadowing Chris Martin.

This year, at Super Bowl LI, Lady Gaga will make her second straight appearance at the big game. Apparently, she may or may not sing on the roof. Because she’s Lady Gaga, whatever she wears will be a topic of discussion. Last year, she leaned into the patriotic aesthetic to sing the national anthem, wearing a sparkly red blazer, red eyeshadow, and a blue manicure. This year, her outfit will likely include a certain pink cowboy hat.

Speculation aside, the real Most Valuable Accessory of the halftime show will be the tights — specifically, fishnets. Why? We’ll get to that. We’ll also get to how many pairs of them it would take to produce an event of this caliber. (Hint: It’s a lot.)

Years ago, Beyoncé perplexed a lot of non-dancers when she admitted to wearing four pairs of tights during performances. Yep, four pairs. “You have to keep it all supported,” she told the audience at The View while patting her thighs. 

On the surface, that makes a lot of sense. More pairs of tights equals more support, and any human (even one as seemingly perfect as Beyoncé) would naturally want to maximize support while dancing in front of giant crowds and hi-def cameras. But that still begs the question: Why fishnets? Why not just regular tights? Wouldn’t more surface area provide more control?

Insert alt text here

Apparently, that’s not the case. Ashley Everett, Beyoncé’s dance captain, explains: “In live performances, we pretty much always wear tights. We usually wear nude fishnets — Capezio,” she says. She adds that compared to standard-issue tights, “fishnets blend a little bit better and look a little more natural. Your skin still comes through enough to make it look like you could be bare-legged, but you’re not.” Most important, she adds that “they’re still tough enough and tight enough to contain and suck it all in.”

Unlike Beyoncé, Everett isn’t committed to wearing multiple pairs. While she’ll occasionally wear some 1980s-inspired shiny skin-colored tights underneath her fishnets to get an extra glow, it’s “usually just one pair.”

For dancer and choreographer Christina Grady — who’s toured and performed with Mariah Carey and Lady Gaga and has her own educational dance intensive called What It Takes — the double pair of fishnets is kind of non-negotiable.

“I’m with Queen B on this one,” she says. “I don’t know if it’s because of the way the fishnets are designed, but it feels like they suck you in more. Instead of one giant piece of stretchy material, you have all these tiny connecting zigzags that are pulling in different directions, creating a more flattering visual.”

Grady recalls shooting a video for Keri Hilson in the desert where the dancers were supposed to nix the tights and instead wear body oil for “that wet leg” look. She said to the directors “Well, you can do all that — and then I’m gonna put the fishnets on, okay?”

Costume designer Soyon An, who’s worked with Britney Spears and Katy Perry, says the first priority is making the performers feel comfortable. Most of them want some kind of coverage, so fishnets are a good compromise if there’s a concern that regular tights might be too noticeable and distracting.

"Capezio fishnets are like the Spanx of fishnets. You really feel them on your legs, kind of pulling everything in."

“The crisscross of the fishnets helps blend into the skin because there’s no sheen,” explains An. “It looks natural. From where you’re sitting in the audience, you’re never going to know that a performer is wearing fishnets. It just blends in with the skin tone.”

It’s true, skin-toned fishnets do blend in quite well — unless, of course, your skin tone happens to not be one of the three (or four, depending on the style) colors Capezio makes them in. Costume designers like An and Marni Senofonte, who designed the Lemonade tour looks, have to individually dye the stockings to match the dancer’s different skin tones. (An personally likes to use Rit Dye.)

While Capezio could stand to do better in its range of skin tone offerings, An swears by the superior construction. “There isn’t any other company out there that makes fishnets like Capezio,” she says. Unlike regular tights that run when your fingernail happens to graze them, the fishnets are a lot more durable.

“Capezio fishnets are like the Spanx of fishnets. You really feel them on your legs, kind of pulling everything in,” An says. Compared to other brands, Capezio fishnets are “like bed sheets with 1,000 thread count versus ones with 100.”

Insert alt text here

Aesthetics aside, tights are also just practical additions to a costume. Grady recalls a particularly frigid Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade performance with Keri Hilson: “They give us our outfits, these cute little white coats — not exactly warm — a little white skirt, and a white tank top underneath. And that’s it. And I’m like, ‘We’re gonna be on the float for five hours.’”

After an emergency run through Macy’s, “we ended up doing the super glossy tights, then two pairs of nude fishnets and some sparkly tights on top. And it was freezing that day,” says Grady. “The tights saved us because our legs were totally exposed.”

Another extremely underrated benefit of tights? Wedgie prevention. Tights and fishnets don’t just suck everything in; they also keep fabric in place. “I always prefer to wear tights, because you never know. If you have on a little leotard or a bikini-type bottom, it’s just safer,” says Everett.

Being on stage, even for those that do it for a living, is a vulnerable experience. When thousands (or in the case of the Super Bowl, millions) of eyes are watching your every move — and you’re moving, like, a lot — tights can provide a feeling of security that allows performers to focus on what really matters: performing. “I feel naked without them on stage,” says Grady. “But the second I’m done performing, the tights are coming off.

So there you have it: Fishnets, regardless of how many pairs it takes, help performers feel as flawless as possible. Even Beyoncé.

The Making of an Official NFL Fan Jersey

On August 26th, 2016, San Francisco 49ers backup quarterback Colin Kaepernick sat during the national anthem. He had done so during two previous preseason games as well, but the story gained worldwide attention after a beat reporter's photo went viral. The conversation became a flashpoint, devouring the sports media landscape and extending into the mainstream. Talking heads fiercely debated both sides of the issue. Newspaper columnists expounded. Bloggers blogged. Twitter eggs did their Twitter egg thing.

And Kaepernick jerseys flew off the shelves.

By September 6th, five days after Kaepernick and San Francisco safety Eric Reid took a knee before the team's final preseason match against the San Diego Chargers (Seattle Seahawks Jeremy Lane sat in protest, too), the quarterback had the top-selling uniform at the NFL Shop. Kaepernick, who pledged to donate the proceeds he received "back into the communities," was surprised but inspired by the sales. "It was something that the jersey sales jumped because of people's belief that there can be change and we can make this country better and that they believe I was someone who can help that change," he said.

For the quarterback, the fact that people were shelling out $99.99 for a Game Jersey, $149.99 for a Limited Jersey, or $299.99 for an Elite Jersey was a sign that his protest struck a chord.

For Nike, however, the massive increase in sales likely caused a massive headache. In 2012, the sporting giant became the NFL's official apparel provider, displacing Reebok while paying a reported $220 million a year for the privilege. Before each season, the company works with the league and retailers around the country to determine which players' jerseys will be available in physical stores like Dick's Sporting Goods and online at sites including Nike aggregates data and pre-makes jerseys based on those numbers, with about a half-dozen players per team available. Huge stars — the Tom Bradys, Odell Beckham Jrs., and Antonio Browns of the world — are pre-produced in large numbers. Less popular players have fewer of their jerseys made, if any are produced at all.

Keep reading >>
Ad from our sponsor
Just One Thing
The Cult Fast Food Chain T-Shirt That Makes a Thoughtful Gift
Insert alt text here

In-N-Out T-Shirts, $12.99 to $14.95

I am part of a club (or cult?) of people who consider In-N-Out to be The Greatest Restaurant in the History of the Universe. We, meaning other believers like Anthony Bourdain, French Laundry and Per Se head chef Thomas Keller, and Flavortown Mayor Guy Fieri, take shifts guarding the secret sauce recipe in a bunker in Irvine.

Anyway, in addition to a mighty fine burger, In-N-Out also makes pretty sweet T-shirts ($12.99 to $14.95) featuring groovy retro graphics. They call to mind simpler times when we only thought of orange things — like the “spread” — as wonderful and delicious.

Even better, In-N-Out lets you buy any T-shirt from its archive, meaning they can potentially make really awesome gifts. I know this because my girlfriend just got me one for Christmas and as I unwrapped it, she explained that it features the graphic from the year I was born. It takes the present from oh, nice, an In-N-Out tee to Oh my god that is so thoughtful and sweet.

And for less than the cost of two #1s, it’s a pretty perfect present for the In-N-Out stan in your life. —Cam Wolf, menswer editor

More good stuff to read today
Ad from our sponsor


All titles, content, publisher names, trademarks, artwork, and associated imagery are trademarks and/or copyright material of their respective owners. All rights reserved. The Spam Archive website contains material for general information purposes only. It has been written for the purpose of providing information and historical reference containing in the main instances of business or commercial spam.

Many of the messages in Spamdex's archive contain forged headers in one form or another. The fact that an email claims to have come from one email address or another does not mean it actually originated at that address! Please use spamdex responsibly.

Yes YOU! Get INVOLVED - Send in your spam and report offenders

Create a rule in outlook or simply forward the junk email you receive to | See contributors

Google + Spam 2010- 2017 Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. unsolicited electric messages (spam) archived for posterity. Link to us and help promote Spamdex as a means of forcing Spammers to re-think the amount of spam they send us.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records index for all time

Please contact us with any comments or questions at Spam Archive is a non-profit library of thousands of spam email messages sent to a single email address. A number of far-sighted people have been saving all their spam and have put it online. This is a valuable resource for anyone writing Bayesian filters. The Spam Archive is building a digital library of Internet spam. Your use of the Archive is subject to the Archive's Terms of Use. All emails viewed are copyright of the respected companies or corporations. Thanks to Benedict Sykes for assisting with tech problems and Google Indexing, ta Ben.

Our inspiration is the "Internet Archive" USA. "Libraries exist to preserve society's cultural artefacts and to provide access to them. If libraries are to continue to foster education and scholarship in this era of digital technology, it's essential for them to extend those functions into the digital world." This is our library of unsolicited emails from around the world. See Spamdex is in no way associated though. Supporters and members of Helping rid the internet of spam, one email at a time. Working with Inernet Aware to improve user knowlegde on keeping safe online. Many thanks to all our supporters including Vanilla Circus for providing SEO advice and other content syndication help | Link to us | Terms | Privacy | Cookies | Complaints | Copyright | Spam emails / ICO | Spam images | Sitemap | All hosting and cloud migration by Cloudworks.

Important: Users take note, this is Spamdex - The Spam Archive for the internet. Some of the pages indexed could contain offensive language or contain fraudulent offers. If an offer looks too good to be true it probably is! Please tread, carefully, all of the links should be fine. Clicking I agree means you agree to our terms and conditions. We cannot be held responsible etc etc.

The Spam Archive - Chronicling spam emails into readable web records

The Glass House | London | SW19 8AE |
Spamdex is a digital archive of unsolicited electronic mail 4.9 out of 5 based on reviews
Spamdex - The Spam Archive Located in London, SW19 8AE. Phone: 08000 0514541.